loke.dev
Header image for A Discreet Tally for the Production Heap

A Discreet Tally for the Production Heap

Standard browser memory metrics are notoriously unreliable, but the modern measureUserAgentSpecificMemory API finally brings production profiling to the browser—with a strict security trade-off.

· 4 min read

There’s a specific kind of anxiety that comes from watching the "Memory" tab in Chrome DevTools while your app hums along in localhost. It’s a clean room—a vacuum. But once that code hits the wild, running on a five-year-old Android phone or a MacBook burdened by 400 open tabs, those pretty DevTools graphs become total fiction.

For years, we’ve tried to peek under the hood of production memory usage using performance.memory. The problem? It’s a non-standard, legacy API that Chrome basically made up, and it’s notoriously stingy with the truth. It gives you a coarse bucket of "used heap," but it’s often rounded to prevent security exploits, making it about as useful as a speedometer that only tells you if you're going "fast" or "slow."

Enter performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory(). It’s the modern, spec-compliant way to figure out exactly how much memory your web app is hogging, but it comes with a few strictly enforced rules.

Why the old ways failed us

If you've ever typed performance.memory into a console, you’ve seen usedJSHeapSize. It’s tempting to use, but it’s a lie. Because of the way browsers share processes between different sites, giving a script accurate memory data is a massive security risk. If I can see exactly how much memory is being used, I might be able to figure out the size of a sensitive image or a cryptographic key loaded in another iframe.

To protect users, browsers either disabled this API or intentionally added "noise" to the data. You aren't seeing the heap; you're seeing a fuzzy approximation of it.

The catch: Cross-Origin Isolation

The new measureUserAgentSpecificMemory API provides real, high-precision data. But the browser won't give it to you unless you prove your site is a fortress. To use it, your page must be cross-origin isolated.

This means you have to send two specific HTTP headers from your server:

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy: require-corp

This tells the browser: "I promise not to talk to anyone else, and nobody else can talk to me." It’s a bit of a headache to implement because it can break third-party scripts (like some tracking pixels or iframes) that don't support CORS. But if you want the data, you have to pay the security tax.

Taking a measurement

Assuming you've sorted out your headers, calling the API is straightforward. It returns a Promise that resolves once the browser has finished a garbage collection (GC) cycle. This is key: it doesn't just give you a snapshot of the current mess; it cleans up first so you see what’s actually sticking around.

Here is the most basic implementation:

async function conductMemoryAudit() {
  if (!window.crossOriginIsolated) {
    console.warn("Memory measurement is only available in cross-origin isolated contexts.");
    return;
  }

  try {
    const result = await performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory();
    console.log("Current memory usage:", result.bytes);
    
    // The 'breakdown' array tells you where the memory is actually going
    result.breakdown.forEach(item => {
      console.log(`${item.types.join(', ')}: ${item.bytes} bytes`);
    });
  } catch (error) {
    if (error instanceof DOMException && error.name === 'SecurityError') {
      console.error("The API is not available in this context.");
    } else {
      throw error;
    }
  }
}

Making it useful for production

You shouldn't call this every five seconds. It triggers garbage collection, which is a heavy operation that can cause "jank" (stuttering) in your UI. Instead, treat it like a discreet tally.

A smart approach is to sample a small percentage of your users or run it at specific milestones, like after a user completes a heavy task or navigates away from a complex dashboard.

function scheduleMeasurement() {
  // Only run for 5% of users to save their CPU cycles
  if (Math.random() > 0.05) return;

  // Use 'requestIdleCallback' to wait for a quiet moment
  if ('requestIdleCallback' in window) {
    window.requestIdleCallback(async () => {
      const memoryData = await performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory();
      
      // Send this data to your analytics endpoint
      navigator.sendBeacon('/log/performance', JSON.stringify({
        memory: memoryData.bytes,
        url: window.location.href,
        timestamp: Date.now()
      }));
    });
  }
}

Reading the Breakdown

The breakdown field is where the real value lives. It splits the memory into categories. You’ll often see window, web worker, or shared worker.

If you have multiple iframes or workers, the API will actually attribute memory to them specifically. This is a godsend for debugging that one specific widget that seems to be leaking memory over time.

A typical result looks like this:

{
  "bytes": 25000000,
  "breakdown": [
    {
      "bytes": 20000000,
      "attribution": [
        {
          "url": "https://myapp.com/",
          "scope": "Window",
          "container": null
        }
      ],
      "types": ["JS"]
    },
    {
      "bytes": 5000000,
      "attribution": [
        {
          "url": "https://myapp.com/worker.js",
          "scope": "DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope",
          "container": null
        }
      ],
      "types": ["JS"]
    }
  ]
}

The "Gotchas"

1. Browser Support: Currently, this is primarily a Chromium-based feature (Chrome, Edge, Brave). Safari and Firefox haven't fully jumped on the bandwagon yet, so always feature-detect.
2. Delayed Results: Because the browser waits for a GC cycle, the promise might take a while to resolve. Don't block your application logic waiting for it.
3. Local Development: If you're testing this locally, you'll need to configure your dev server (like Vite or Webpack) to send those COOP/COEP headers, or the function will simply throw an error.

Monitoring memory in production used to feel like trying to weigh a cloud. With measureUserAgentSpecificMemory, it's more like weighing a suitcase: you have to jump through some security hoops at the airport, but at least the scale is accurate. Use it sparingly, log the results, and you might finally find out why your app feels "heavy" after an hour of use.